that you may become blameless and harmless, children of God without fault in the midst of a crooked and perverse generation, among whom you shine as lights in the world that you may approve the things that are excellent, that you may be sincere and without offense till the day of Christ, You will see that they all point to the idea that we should be trying to live a life without offense toward God and man. Here is a list of scriptures that discuss the issue of being blameless. So what is the difference between an unbeliever who lives in open rebellion to God and a believer who falls into sin, occasionally or regularly? Answer: the believer is saved and preserved by grace. Then he would even forgive us of habitual sin. Surely he didn’t set a higher standard for us than he did for himself. Jesus told us to forgive our brother 70×7 times in one day. Ideally we should not sin ( 1 John 2:1), however it is still possible for believers to commit acts of sin – and still be forgiven. A genuine Christian who is dead to sin will not attempt to sin knowing that he can get away with it. Paul answered this question in Romans 6:1, 2. For some sins though, even though God may have forgiven you, you may still have to face the consequences (as opposed to judgment) e.g. Even the most extreme Arminian believes that if you repent of your sin, God will forgive you and forget your sin. Is that the same as having their sins forgiven and forgotten? If it is, then all Christians believe you could sin and get away with it. So does that give us a license to sin? Does that mean we could sin and get away with it? First of all we must ask what it means to get away with it. Every believer is capable of committing acts of sin (as opposed to practicing sin). However it does not imply a sinless life. I must add that a habitually sinful lifestyle in open rebellion to God would most likely indicate that a person was never saved. Needless to say he never wrote back.Īcts of sin do not cause a believer to lose his salvation. I asked him for his scriptural support for that statement. His argument: “Sin is unbelief it is anti-faith”, implying that acts of sin are the opposite to saving faith. He also believes that sin can cause someone to lose their salvation. I recently read an article by another writer who also does not believe in unconditional eternal security, but unlike me, he believes that unbelief is not the only thing that can steal a believers salvation. stops believing the gospel and walks away from Christ. A believer can forfeit his salvation if he apostatizes i.e. I do believe however that God preserves a believer, keeps him by His power, keeps him from falling as long as he continues in his faith.I do not believe in unconditional eternal security i.e.There is a subtle difference in perspective that makes the difference between living a victorious life in Christ and living a life of bondage to the law.Īt this point I should reiterate my beliefs concerning eternal security: I am not downplaying the horror of our sin, but we must understand that holiness is not merely the absence of sin, but having the nature of God. We are called to be blameless – living above reproach and not creating stumbling blocks that turn others away from Christ. Ideally we should not sin, but avoiding sin is not to be the focus of our Christian walk. Blameless means to live above reproach.ĭOWNLOAD FREE CHAPTERS FROM OUR NEW BOOKS.Our sins should not cause Christ to get a bad name.Ideally we should not sin, but sinlessness is not what we are called to achieve.In this article, we look at the scriptures, and we will see that being blameless is not the same thing as being sinless. And since they are not sinless, they fall into condemnation. They read scriptures in the Bible which say that we should be faultless and blameless and they interpret that to mean that they should be sinless. Many believers fall into deep condemnation whenever they sin.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |